Industrial AI engineering and research · Germany and India

Build AI that survives the factory floor.

Sensing-based AI for factories and critical assets: end-of-line acoustic testing, in-process weld monitoring, switchgear partial discharge and multi-modal condition monitoring — with energy-efficient edge AI and sovereign deployments where your data never leaves the plant. Co-developed with your engineers, on your process, against your targets.

Vision · Audio · Ultrasonic · Vibration Lidar · Temperature · Humidity · Gas Edge AI, on-premise & on-device Peer-reviewed methods With NeuroControls GmbH
Experience from German industry
  • Automotive OEMs & suppliers
  • Battery cell & module manufacturers
  • Machine-building SMEs
  • Technical universities
  • Leading research institutes
What we do

Four ways we work with manufacturers

We do not sell a generic product. Every system is co-developed with your engineers against your process, your machines and your targets. These are the engagements most clients start with; the full list includes feasibility studies, datasets, advisory and training.

Co-Development R&D & Proof of Concept

Applied R&D done together with your engineers, on your process, with a measurable target agreed up front.

Learn more

Multi-Modal Sensing + Edge AI Systems

Co-developed sensor units and on-device AI with NeuroControls GmbH: vision, audio (audible to ultrasonic), vibration, lidar, environmental and gas sensing across one platform.

Learn more

Sovereign AI & Federated Learning

AI that stays on your premises: on-device and on-premise deployment, and federated learning across plants without moving raw data.

Learn more

Energy-Efficient Edge AI Deployment

Models sized for the hardware and the site's power budget: quantisation, pruning, efficient architectures, real-time on embedded devices.

Learn more

How we work

An engagement ladder, not a package

Each step has a fixed scope and a clear output. You decide at every rung whether to climb the next one. Most Indian clients start remotely; measurement and deployment steps happen on site.

Free · 30–45 min

Discovery call

You bring the problem and the data you have. We ask the awkward questions and tell you whether sensing AI is the right tool.

2–10 days

Feasibility study

Fixed scope, fixed fee. Where you already have recordings, from an end-of-line test cell, a weld monitor or a survey instrument, the study runs on those first; no new hardware is needed for a first answer.

2–8 weeks (PoC) · 3–12 months (R&D)

Co-development R&D or PoC

Milestone-based. A validated prototype on your data, evaluated against strong baselines, with a dataset you own.

Per project

Pilot line, then roll-out

Sensor units and edge AI on one line, integrated with PLC, SCADA or MES, handed over to your OT/IT team, then scaled.

Already have a data science team? An advisory retainer gives you senior engineering time by the day or month.

Sovereign AI · Federated learning

Your data never leaves the plant. Your plants still learn from each other.

Cloud-first industrial AI runs into data residency law, customer contracts and trade-secret reality. Our default architecture is inference on the edge, training and monitoring on-premise, and federated learning across sites so only model updates travel, never raw recordings.

  • On-device and on-premise deployment with no cloud dependency
  • Secure aggregation, model versioning and per-site drift monitoring
  • Open-weight models and open tooling wherever they meet the requirement
  • Architecture and data-flow documentation for your IT security review, mapped to IEC 62443 where OT components are involved
Plant Araw data stays Plant Braw data stays Plant Craw data stays Partner siteraw data stays Shared modelsecure aggregation Only model updates travel. On-premise aggregator, versioned, monitored.
Proven where it counts

We build on what your plant already trusts

Acoustic testing and monitoring are standard practice in three places. We do not ask you to believe in a new method; we add learning to one you already run.

End-of-line acoustic testing

Established practicePowertrain and e-drive plants routinely screen every motor, gearbox and compressor acoustically before shipment.
What we addLimits learned from your data instead of set by hand per variant; fewer false rejects; each failed signature traced to the station that caused it.
See the sector

In-process weld monitoring

Established practiceLaser and arc weld cells are monitored optically, and automotive guidelines are written around optical sensors.
What we addAirborne acoustic emission as a validated second channel, with the capability studies your quality auditor expects.
See the sector

Switchgear partial discharge

Established practiceHandheld ultrasonic and TEV surveys of switchgear are routine maintenance practice.
What we addThe same survey made continuous and unattended: permanently installed acoustic sensing with learned classification and severity trends to your maintenance system.
See the sector
Proof · Publication-backed case studies

Methods that survived peer review before they reached a plant

Our founder's methods were published and peer-reviewed before they reached a plant. We evaluate honestly: strong baselines, realistic conditions, no invented numbers. Performance figures are quoted from the papers or from your own data, never from a brochure.

Acoustic monitoring of joint-gap formation in laser beam butt welding
Laser welding / metal processing · Germany · Crystals 2023

Acoustic monitoring of joint-gap formation in laser beam butt welding

Challenge
Joint-gap formation causes weld defects that are hard to detect in-process; existing monitoring did not generalise across process settings.
What we did
Research led by our founder. Airborne acoustic emission recorded in the welding cell; STFT time-frequency features; neural network classifier trained with augmentation under process variability; monitoring framework developed with the process engineers.
Outcome
Automatic in-process detection of gap formation under varying parameters, published and peer-reviewed.

Read the paper · DOI 10.3390/cryst13101451

Partial discharge monitoring using deep neural networks with acoustic emission
Power / electrical asset monitoring · Germany · INTER-NOISE 2021

Partial discharge monitoring using deep neural networks with acoustic emission

Challenge
Partial discharge is an early indicator of insulation failure; manual and electrical measurement is costly and not continuous.
What we did
Research led by our founder. Airborne acoustic emission; comparison of time-frequency representations; deep neural networks for detection and classification; evaluation designed around maintenance decisions.
Outcome
Automatic, non-contact detection suited to continuous monitoring.

Read the paper · DOI 10.3397/in-2021-2373

IDMT-Traffic: an open benchmark dataset for acoustic traffic monitoring research
Infrastructure / smart-city acoustics · Germany · EUSIPCO 2021

IDMT-Traffic: an open benchmark dataset for acoustic traffic monitoring research

Challenge
No public, reproducible benchmark existed for acoustic vehicle detection with realistic microphone mismatch.
What we did
Co-authored by our founder. An open dataset with evaluation splits, baseline protocol and robustness framing (microphone mismatch, real-world noise).
Outcome
Publicly released and used by the research community; a model for the honest evaluation we bring to every client project.

Read the paper · DOI 10.23919/EUSIPCO54536.2021.9616080

Acoustic insights into the corn extrusion process for enhanced quality control
Food processing / FMCG · Germany · INTER-NOISE 2024

Acoustic insights into the corn extrusion process for enhanced quality control

Challenge
Extrusion quality varies with process changes; inline quality checks were manual or delayed.
What we did
Research led by our founder. Acoustic characterisation of the extrusion process under process changes; quality-oriented evaluation design; transferable monitoring patterns.
Outcome
Acoustic signatures shown to track quality changes, a pattern transferable to other continuous processes.

Read the paper · DOI 10.3397/in_2024_2788

See the publication list

Insights

Notes from the factory floor and the research bench

Practical writing on acoustic and vibration AI, end-of-line testing, sovereign architectures, edge deployment and what actually gets a project to production.

All insights

FAQ

The questions every plant asks first

Will this work on our machine and at our noise level?

That is exactly what a feasibility study answers, in two to ten days, on your data or a short measurement campaign. We design sensing setups for hostile acoustic environments and train models across the process window so they generalise. If the physics says no, we say no-go.

Which sensors do we actually need?

It depends on the failure mode, not the asset. Vibration for rotating parts, audible acoustics for process context and coverage, ultrasound for leaks, arcing and early friction, acoustic emission for in-process material events. Often we start with the sensors and recordings you already have, from an end-of-line test cell, a weld monitor or a survey instrument, and add the NeuroControls multi-modal units only where fused data is needed.

Do you replace the condition monitoring system we already run?

No. Most continuous plants already have a vibration monitoring system and a vendor behind it, and that is usually the right tool for standard rotating assets. We work alongside it on the assets it cannot explain: acoustically hostile areas, intermittent faults, in-process quality, electrical assets, and systems whose alerts your team has stopped trusting and wants evaluated independently.

Can it run without cloud and without our data leaving the site?

Yes. That is our default architecture: inference on an edge device at the machine, training and monitoring on-premise, and federated learning if several plants should learn together. We document the data flows for your IT security review, mapped to IEC 62443 where OT components are involved.

Do we own the data, the model and the hardware?

Yes. Every project delivers the dataset with its specification, the trained model weights and the documentation to you, and we do not train across clients. Hardware is yours once deployed. We use open-weight models and open tooling wherever they meet the requirement so you are not locked to us.

How much data do we need and how long does it take to collect?

Usually less than you fear. A feasibility study needs a few hours of recordings with known outcomes, and where you already have recordings it runs on those first, with no new hardware. A proof of concept typically needs days to a few weeks across your product mix. Representativeness and label quality matter far more than volume.

Can you sign an NDA and work with Indian time zones?

Yes on both. NDAs are standard, and anonymised or synthetic samples are fine for a first conversation. Monday to Friday, 09:00 to 18:00 German time (CET in winter, CEST in summer). In Indian Standard Time that is 12:30 to 21:30 from late March to late October and 13:30 to 22:30 for the rest of the year. Calls with India are scheduled between 13:30 and 16:30 IST all year. On-site visits to Indian plants are part of the measurement and deployment steps.

What does a feasibility study cost?

It is a fixed-scope, fixed-fee engagement quoted after a free discovery call, because the scope depends on your data and whether a measurement campaign is needed. Invoices are issued in EUR from Germany; your finance team should check the applicable tax treatment.

Who supports the system after the project?

Your OT/IT team, trained during handover, with an optional advisory retainer from us and named engineers who stay on the account. Fleet MLOps, monitoring and rollback paths are designed in from the start so the system is operable without us.

Ready to find out if it works on your machines?

Start with a free 30 to 45 minute discovery call. Bring the problem, the recordings you already have and your questions. We will tell you honestly whether sensing-based AI is the right tool and what the next step would cost in days, not months.